The governance infrastructure
built from the inside.
Why I Built Darwin — CEO Letter
There is a categorical difference between a company that adopts a standard and the company that built it. Medigram is the latter. The standards that now govern healthcare AI were co-authored here.
Governance infrastructure
that makes AI outputs
defensible.
Medigram is not a compliance checklist or an audit tool. It is operational infrastructure, commissioned on your premises, with local state persistence and sealed evidence records, making every AI-assisted decision traceable, auditable, and defensible at clinical, regulatory, and financial levels simultaneously.
The distinction matters because AI in high-stakes environments does not wait for governance infrastructure to catch up. The decisions are happening now. The legal exposure is real now. The question is whether the infrastructure that documents and defends those decisions meets the standard that survives scrutiny: from a regulator, a payer, a union, or a court.
Medigram's infrastructure does. Because Medigram's team built the standard it is held to.
Built by people
with operational skin in the game.
Predict → Shape → Protect
Read the full story
The governance model
no startup has access to,
and few organizations of any scale.
Medigram is led by Sherri Douville, who founded and chairs TTIC, the Trustworthy Technology and Innovation Consortium. TTIC maintains independent governance, standards, and decision-making boundaries to preserve the integrity of its consortium activities, and convenes health systems, academic medical centers, and clinical technology leaders who are drawn by a single criterion: the rigor of the work itself.
The governance model TTIC produces is developed by the people who operate in the highest-stakes clinical and regulatory environments in the country. It is not designed by committee for the broadest possible adoption. It is designed to hold under the kind of scrutiny that ends careers and shutters programs. That standard of rigor is what determines who participates and who does not.
That architecture is what Medigram is built on. Not a framework aligned with TTIC's work. Not a product built in its spirit. The model itself, made into production infrastructure. That relationship cannot be replicated by acquiring a standards citation or hiring a compliance team. It is built from years of doing the work.
You are either deploying
the standard, or
a vendor's version of it.
Healthcare AI governance has attracted vendors who adopt published frameworks and build compliance products around them. That is a legitimate category. But there is a different, urgent category: infrastructure built by the people who wrote the framework, who understand precisely where the framework is enforced and where it is aspirational, and who have the institutional relationships to know what regulators, payers, and health system boards actually need when the pressure arrives.
Medigram operates in the second category. The governance infrastructure it deploys is not built on top of a standard. It is the standard made operational. It is the same governance structure MedTech and pro sports need, and only one company built the infrastructure and ecosystem to meet it: Medigram.
Work in Motion → Trusted Intelligence in Motion
Built for Work in Motion
Medigram was born from a simple observation: healthcare happens in motion, while much enterprise technology was designed around stationary systems. The company began by building secure, reliable mobile clinical communication that could move with clinicians and work where they worked.
Read the full story